Monday, June 28, 2004
i haven't read rasul. apparently the court held, in a really mixed bag of concurrences and dissents, that rasul has been denied due process, in being denied a hearing.
my question is, are there any non-frivolous grounds on which to sue or charge bush as a war criminal? what court, which law? sounds like attempted confinement, maybe with a few battery charges in there if rasul was mishandled while unlawfully detained.
update: thanks to the clerk, i have learned the folks who won rasul were ray's cocounsel in the ohio supermax case, just upheld in 6th circuit, and just filed a suit against abu greib contractors. pdf
now that i've read the complaint, it's devastating. lots more there than the media bites had indicated.
my question is, are there any non-frivolous grounds on which to sue or charge bush as a war criminal? what court, which law? sounds like attempted confinement, maybe with a few battery charges in there if rasul was mishandled while unlawfully detained.
update: thanks to the clerk, i have learned the folks who won rasul were ray's cocounsel in the ohio supermax case, just upheld in 6th circuit, and just filed a suit against abu greib contractors. pdf
now that i've read the complaint, it's devastating. lots more there than the media bites had indicated.
Comments:
Post a Comment
