Monday, August 16, 2004
i read yesterday about an important case decided recently by the 9th circuit.
it validates the positions i took in majors v abell.
i blog about it elsewhere, at ballots.blogspot.com amd majors.blogspot.com, but i'll note it here too. my life has been falling apart lately, in part because i spent several years getting majors ready to take to the supreme court, and then failed, and i've been depressed and upset about that, and some other personal catastrophes. so it's nice to get some validation from another circuit, if only the 9th, that i was i was right and they were wrong.
it validates the positions i took in majors v abell.
i blog about it elsewhere, at ballots.blogspot.com amd majors.blogspot.com, but i'll note it here too. my life has been falling apart lately, in part because i spent several years getting majors ready to take to the supreme court, and then failed, and i've been depressed and upset about that, and some other personal catastrophes. so it's nice to get some validation from another circuit, if only the 9th, that i was i was right and they were wrong.
Comments:
Post a Comment
