Wednesday, December 08, 2004
smug:
hogan and harston has a case in the supreme court today, and their "news" webpage, http://www.hhlaw.com/site/news.aspx
doesn't bother to mention it. findlaw used to do a pretty good job of having briefs online. this seems to have declined lately. i don't know if that has anything to do with them being bought by west publishing.
found the briefs.
for the good guys it's scotusblog's goldstein (and how!) and lawrence tribe, and the guys from north dakota who did the oral argument today. about which i can't find liveblogging, because i don't know how to search the net that way.
apparently veneman is out so the case will be renamed, but we don't know to what. secretary of agriculture v livestock. moo.
hogan and harston has a case in the supreme court today, and their "news" webpage, http://www.hhlaw.com/site/news.aspx
doesn't bother to mention it. findlaw used to do a pretty good job of having briefs online. this seems to have declined lately. i don't know if that has anything to do with them being bought by west publishing.
found the briefs.
for the good guys it's scotusblog's goldstein (and how!) and lawrence tribe, and the guys from north dakota who did the oral argument today. about which i can't find liveblogging, because i don't know how to search the net that way.
apparently veneman is out so the case will be renamed, but we don't know to what. secretary of agriculture v livestock. moo.
Comments:
Post a Comment
