Monday, April 11, 2005
oops, never mind, wrong blog.
Landell v Sorrell pdf is a case about expenditure limits in Vermont. The latest, from Hasen, is that more dissents have been issued. The case is certworthy. My limited and possibly wrong impression is that any time a dissent is issued, that restarts the 90 day clock for cert. I've been wrong before.
I had forgotten this is a case that involves both RtL, Vermont Right to Life, and the Vermonth Libertarian Party.
En banc review was denied. One of the 3-judge panel dissented, and 4 other judges dissented from denial of rehearing. So the split among the panel, among the circuit, and conflicting rulings from other circuits, make it a reasonable case for cert.
Previous cases involving the Libertarian Party or its members include Valeo, Grant v Meyer, ACLF, Chandler v Miller, Edmonds v Indianapolis, McConnell v FEC, Clingman v Beaver. Beaver may be handed down as soon as this month.
Landell v Sorrell pdf is a case about expenditure limits in Vermont. The latest, from Hasen, is that more dissents have been issued. The case is certworthy. My limited and possibly wrong impression is that any time a dissent is issued, that restarts the 90 day clock for cert. I've been wrong before.
I had forgotten this is a case that involves both RtL, Vermont Right to Life, and the Vermonth Libertarian Party.
En banc review was denied. One of the 3-judge panel dissented, and 4 other judges dissented from denial of rehearing. So the split among the panel, among the circuit, and conflicting rulings from other circuits, make it a reasonable case for cert.
Previous cases involving the Libertarian Party or its members include Valeo, Grant v Meyer, ACLF, Chandler v Miller, Edmonds v Indianapolis, McConnell v FEC, Clingman v Beaver. Beaver may be handed down as soon as this month.
Comments:
Post a Comment
