Sunday, May 29, 2005
Lingle v Chevron pdf.
I'd missed this case in the hoopla over Beef.
Court eviscerates takings clause again.
O'Connor, slightly out of context, "fundamentally arbitrary and irrational."
So I guess I cite that as
"arbitrary", Lingle v Chevron, 544 U.S. __ (2005)
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/04-163.pdf.
And ""arbitrary", Lingle v Chevron, 544 U.S. __ (2005), Kennedy, J. concurring.
I'd missed this case in the hoopla over Beef.
Court eviscerates takings clause again.
O'Connor, slightly out of context, "fundamentally arbitrary and irrational."
So I guess I cite that as
"arbitrary", Lingle v Chevron, 544 U.S. __ (2005)
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/04-163.pdf.
And ""arbitrary", Lingle v Chevron, 544 U.S. __ (2005), Kennedy, J. concurring.
Comments:
Post a Comment