<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Sunday, May 29, 2005

Lingle v Chevron pdf.
I'd missed this case in the hoopla over Beef.
Court eviscerates takings clause again.
O'Connor, slightly out of context, "fundamentally arbitrary and irrational."

So I guess I cite that as
"arbitrary", Lingle v Chevron, 544 U.S. __ (2005)
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/04-163.pdf.

And ""arbitrary", Lingle v Chevron, 544 U.S. __ (2005), Kennedy, J. concurring.

Comments:
<$BlogCommentBody$>
(0) comments <$BlogCommentDeleteIcon$>
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?