<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Thursday, February 26, 2015

mentioned at scotusblog. Amy Howe, Thursday round-upSCOTUSblog (Feb. 26, 2015, 9:48 AM), http://www.scotusblog.com/2015/02/thursday-round-up-264/

Yesterday’s decision in Yates v. United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary.  Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog (with a Plain English explanation at the end); other coverage comes from Tony Mauro for the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Richard Wolf of USA Today, and Jeremy Jacobs of Greenwire.  Commentary on the case, much of which focuses on what the decision may (or may not) mean for the Court’s eventual decision in King v. Burwell, comes from Noah Feldman in his column for Bloomberg View, Kent Scheidegger forCrime and Consequences, Mark Miller at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Todd Haugh in a podcast for the Northwestern University Law Review’s online edition, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog (Hasen also had a shorter post earlier in the day), Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Brianne Gorod at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, and the blog Arbitrary Aardvark.

Comments:
<$BlogCommentBody$>
(0) comments <$BlogCommentDeleteIcon$>
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?